Doctrine 

18 creative works found

  • Bible with yellow flowers, still life for holidays !O Give thanks unto the Lord for He is good; for his loving kindness endureth for ever. Pslam 136:1! /

  • Title: Failure / Capture Date: 12/08/2007 / Dimensions: 3872×2495 / Exposure: 1/5 sec at f/5.0 / Focal Length: 65mm / ISO: 1000 / Filter: No / Flash: No / Uploaded Date: 12/08/2007 / Comments: I shot this at my nephew’s graduation from the University of Texas at Austin (GO Longhorns!). I just thought it was interesting that this chair was empty. / Please visit my site: – Charles Dobbs Photography and receive a 10% discount off my RedBubble Pricing when you order RedBubble Products directly from me! © 2008 Charles Dobbs Photography. All photographs and artworks in this portfolio are copyrighted and owned by the artist, Charles Dobbs. Any reproduction, modification, publication, transmission, transfer, or exploitation of the content, for personal or commercial use, whether in whole or in part, without written permission from the artist is strictly prohibited. All rights reserved.

  • a mixture of what goes on in Harlot churches….a computer graphic, artwork, with a message….......read the picture..You decide!

  • He did not need his specs to see / His vision of such clarity / Of what we needed to be free / To live our lives in harmony / / Send hate to an obscurity / View war as a perversity / Stand up, but with passivity / Choose all your choices peacefully / / This painting was inspired by the wisdom of a great man of peace, Mahatma Gandhi. How quickly society has forgotten the wisdom he strove to bring to us, and the sacrifices he made of himself in doing so. In a nutshell, Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy was one of equality for all, peace, and social development with respect and dignity for the poor. / / I hope this tribute artwork has helped you to remember and reflect on Gandhi’s important messages to us all, especially with the increasingly violent and troubled times we are living in. / /

  • He did not need his specs to see / His vision of such clarity / Of what we needed to be free / To live our lives in harmony / / Send hate to an obscurity / View war as a perversity / Stand up, but with passivity / Choose all your choices peacefully / / This painting was inspired by the wisdom of a great man of peace, Mahatma Gandhi. How quickly society has forgotten the wisdom he strove to bring to us, and the sacrifices he made of himself in doing so. In a nutshell, Mahatma Gandhi’s philosophy was one of equality for all, peace, and social development with respect and dignity for the poor. / / I hope this tribute artwork has helped you to remember and reflect on Gandhi’s important messages to us all, especially with the increasingly violent and troubled times we are living in. / /

  • eInquisitive
    by Anthony Delgado

    We strive to provide questions as well as answers to real life questions and conditions. The proposition is that you, the reader, will th…

    At eInquisitive.com, we strive to provide questions as well as answers to real life questions and conditions. The proposition is that you, the reader, will think about life or situations of life in a way that you may not have previously contemplated. Our goal is to provide accurate, spiritual advice and to prompt a deeper understanding of God and of the existence of God. Remember to read with an open mind and an open heart and we know that you will expose a more comprehensive awareness of the spiritual life. http://einquisitive.com/blog/

  • RedBubble T-Shirt designs are printed on 100% cotton American Apparel fabric, and are available in cuts to suit men, women and children. To keep them looking great, wash them cold and hang them up to dry. Zazzle Get the hottest T-shirts on the Internet. Choose from thousands of funny, vintage and other great T-shirt designs then customize to fit your size and style. No minimums, orders produced in 24 hours, and 100% satisfaction guaranteed. Zazzle is THE place for T-shirts and all your custom printing needs! Personalize any shirt – Every design on any styles or colors (450+) – No minimum – Organic styles - / Sizes up to 6XL – Satisfaction Guaranteed A tee that is perfect for those in Training or Management who want to share a very simple concept. / To make a full confession or acknowledgment:. To admit as being in accordance with fact, truth, or a claim; acknowledge. / To admit the existence, reality, or truth of. / / / I have subdivided this category into sections: follow the links and hit on exactly what fits you. You are now at ALL TEXT TEES ALCOHOL ATTITUDE BLACK/DARK HUMOUR CURRENT EVENTS FEMINISM GEEK INNUENDO OFFENSIVE PLAY ON WORDS POLITICAL SATIRE RELIGION TV QUOTES ANIMAL SERIES ART TO WEAR BIRDS CATS AND DOGS SERIES CELTIC SERIES CUTE SERIES DID I HEAR YOU RIGHT SERIES DIGITAL SERIES EINSTEIN SERIES FOR F*’s AKE SERIES GAY SERIES KISS SERIES LINE DRAWING SERIES MANAGRAM SERIES NATIVE AMERICAN SERIES PALINDROME AND AMBIGRAM SERIES PHALLUS SERIES PISS TAKE SERIES RUDE FOOD SERIES SEASONAL SERIES SIGN AND SYMBOL SERIES SMILE SERIES TEXT ONLY SERIES UK POLITICS UNDERWEAR SERIES VINTAGE BURLESQUE SERİES WTF IS THAT ALL ABOUT? My zazzle gallery has a premium range of gifts that are suitable for people of all ages and tastes: an eclectic collection of unusually imaginative, hip and sometimes beautiful designs. Enjoy browsing though this store and please feel free to comment: there is always room for improvement. / / / Some products from my Zazzle store Female Contemporary Art More Zazzle choices from Female Contemporary Art Wear my Art at Female Contemporary Art My Images Do Not Belong To The Public Domain. All images are copyright © taiche. All Rights Reserved. Copying, altering, displaying or redistribution of any of these images without written permission from the artist is strictly prohibited / See more of taiche at Female Contemporary Art / / Baby Custom T-Shirts :dress that baby up with a special design on a custom t-shirt, long sleeve or onesize / Kids Custom T-Shirts .from organic t-shirts to long sleeve shirts, boys, girls, and toddlers can fill their fashion needs with a one-of-a-kind custom t-shirts for kids. Check out the latest organic t-shirts, sweatshirts, and girls shirts. And plenty of styles for toddlers too! Aprons / Bags / Buttons / Cards / Hats / Keds Shoes / Keychains / Magnets / Mousepads / Mugs / Postage / Postcards / Stickers / T-Shirt / Ties* Don’t forget my Calendar Section

  • 2009. 9×12 ballpoint pen and prismacolor marker on 11×14 bristol. tongue in cheek

  • Taken in N. Ireland

  • The Cybersecurity act of 2009 or the fairness doctrine comes to the internet
    by richardredhawk

    What shall we endure next By Brad O’Leary Gird your blogs, because if liberals in Congress get their way, President Obama will ha…

    What shall we endure next By Brad O’Leary Gird your blogs, because if liberals in Congress get their way, President Obama will have sole discretionary authority to shut down the Internet or critical parts of the Internet should he feel his presidency is being tested. Worse, under the guise of cybersecurity, Obama will essentially be granted the power to destroy free speech on the web. On April 1st of this year, Senators Rockefeller, Snowe, Bayh and Nelson introduced bills S. 773 and S.778, collectively called the Cybersecurity Act, which would give President Obama dictatorial power over the Internet during a time of national crisis or emergency. All of the bills’ sponsors voted for the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 that prohibited organizations and individuals from running advocacy ads against candidates 60 days in advance of a general election. Now it seems these same people have conjured up a gag order for the Internet. According to the current drafts, under the Cyber Security Act of 2009 the President may “declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shut down of Internet traffic to and from any comprised federal government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network”. He may also “order the disconnection of any Federal Government or United States critical infrastructure information systems or networks in the interest of national security.” What constitutes “cybersecurity emergency” or “critical infrastructure information system or network” is left completely up to the President to define. We know that the Administration, according to Rahm Emanuel, never wants “a serious crisis to go to waste”. We also know the Administration supports the regulation of free speech on the Internet. President Obama’s choice to lead the powerful Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs is none other than Cass Sunstein, a radical Harvard law professor and supporter of the Fairness Doctrine for the Internet. According to Sunstein, “A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government. “ Obama campaign fundraiser and FCC Chair nominee, Julius Genachowski, is a supporter of “Net neutrality”, the first step in applying the Fairness Doctrine to the Internet. “Net neutrality” proponents like Genachowski would have government decide what content Internet operators and network owners must provide. Incredibly, they claim this is to keep the Internet free and open to all, when in reality, their goal is to usher the heavy hands of federal regulators into the tent. Stifling any venue where ideology competes with left-wing mainstream media has always been a goal of the left and Obama. Obama has just been more evasive in his means by supporting policies such as “net neutrality” and wobbling on the reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine to talk radio. Liberal members of Congress are now set on sending America on an unconstitutional b-line away from Uncle Sam and directly to Big Brother. The Cybersecurity Act is also includes a provision where “The Department of Commerce shall serve as the clearinghouse of cybersecuirty threat and vulnerability information to the Federal Government and private sector owned (emphasis mine) critical infrastructure information systems and networks.” Shelving all privacy laws including the requirement for warrants, the Secretary of Commerce “shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule or policy restricting such access.” Senator Rockefeller made it clear in his statement what “relevant data” this act could include when he stated “We must protect our critical infrastructure at all costs – from our water to our electricity, to banking, traffic lights and electronic health records – the list goes on.” While we have worried about cyber attacks from Russia and China, who would have thought the greatest threat would come from members of our own Congress. __ _ _ _ _ ___ Cybersecurity Act of 2009 / A bill to ensure the continued free flow of commerce within the United States and with its global trading partners through secure cyber communications, to provide for the continued development and exploitation of the Internet and intranet communications for such purposes, to provide for the development of a cadre of information technology specialists to improve and maintain effective cybersecurity defenses against disruption, and for other purposes. / Sponsor: Sen. John Rockefeller [D-WV] / Cosponsors [as of 2009-04-18] / Sen. Olympia Snowe [R-ME] / Sen. Bill Nelson [D-FL] / Sen. Evan Bayh [D-IN] / Introduced April 1, 2009 / www.govtrack. us

  • surrender
    by Dan Elbourne

    i need a guru / i need a sensei / i’m looking for someone / to show me the way stumbling forwards / and fumbling blindly / please won’t …

    poetry isn’t my main thing, but i thought that i’d step outside of my comfort zone a bit :)

  • Courtesy Wikipedia here Karma (Sanskrit: कर्म kárma (help·info), kárman- “act, action, performance”; Pali: kamma) is the concept of “action” or “deed” in Indian religions understood as that which causes the entire cycle of cause and effect (i.e., the cycle called saṃsāra) originating in ancient India and treated in Hindu, Jain, Sikh and Buddhist philosophies. In these systems, the effects of all deeds are viewed as actively shaping past, present, and future experiences. The results or ‘fruits’ of actions are called karma-phala. Courtesy wikipedia here Dogma is the established belief or doctrine held by a religion, ideology or any kind of organization: it is authoritative and not to be disputed, doubted or diverged from. The term derives from Greek δόγμα “that which seems to one, opinion or belief” and that from δοκέω (dokeo), “to think, to suppose, to imagine”. The plural is either dogmas or dogmata , from Greek δόγματα. At the core of the dogma concept is absolutism, infallibility, irrefutability, unquestioned acceptance (among adherents) and anti-skepticism. These concepts typically invoke criticism from moderate and modulated conceptual approaches, and thus “dogma” is often colloquially used to indicate a doctrine which has the problem of claiming absolute truth, when other concepts may be superior. ACRYLIC ART CALENDARS CARDS POETRY PHOTOGRAPHY – ANIMALS PHOTOGRAPHY -CANDID SHOTS PHOTOGRAPHY – CATS AND DOGS PHOTOGRAPHY – CONTEMPORARY WORK PHOTOGRAPHY – FLOWERS PHOTOGRAPHY – INSECTS PHOTOGRAPHY – TRADITIONALLY TURKISH PHOTOGRAPHY – TREE AND TREE PARTS T-SHİRTS My Images Do Not Belong To The Public Domain. All images are copyright © taiche. All Rights Reserved. Copying, altering, displaying or redistribution of any of these images without written permission from the artist is strictly prohibited / More products available / Why not follow me on / or join me at I have subdivided this category into sections: follow the links and hit on exactly what fits you. You are now at *ALL TEXT TEES ALCOHOL ATTITUDE BLACK/DARK HUMOUR CURRENT EVENTS- FEMINISM GEEK INNUENDO OFFENSIVE PLAY ON WORDS POLITICAL SATIRE RELIGION / TV QUOTES ANIMAL SERIES ART TO WEAR BIRDS CATS AND DOGS SERIES CELTIC SERIES CUTE SERIES DID I HEAR YOU RIGHT SERIES DIGITAL SERIES EINSTEIN SERIES FOR F*’s AKE SERIES GAY SERIES KISS SERIES LINE DRAWING SERIES MANAGRAM SERIES NATIVE AMERICAN SERIES PALINDROME AND AMBIGRAM SERIES PHALLUS SERIES PISS TAKE SERIES RUDE FOOD SERIES SEASONAL SERIES SIGN AND SYMBOL SERIES SMILE SERIES TEXT ONLY SERIES UK POLITICS UNDERWEAR SERIES VINTAGE BURLESQUE SERİES WTF IS THAT ALL ABOUT? See more of taiche at ZAZZLE / Baby Custom T-Shirts :dress that baby up with a special design on a custom t-shirt, long sleeve or onesize / Kids Custom T-Shirts .from organic t-shirts to long sleeve shirts, boys, girls, and toddlers can fill their fashion needs with a one-of-a-kind custom t-shirts for kids. Check out the latest organic t-shirts, sweatshirts, and girls shirts. And plenty of styles for toddlers too! Aprons / Bags / Buttons / Cards / Hats / Keds Shoes / Keychains / Magnets / Mousepads / Mugs / Postage / Postcards / Stickers / T-Shirt / Ties

  • 4 July: Karma Reigns!
    by taiche

    Features A mega huge thanks to the hosts of the following: !http://images-0.redbubble.net/img/users/size:135×135/view:avatar/hert…

    Features A mega huge thanks to the hosts of the following: (not forgetting Hertsman). ..The magic goes on …..... Karma” was featured in LEFT WING VALUES JULY FEATURES /

  • Martin Luthers’ theme was,by Grace alone,by Faith alone, / by Scripture alone,by Christ alone.Original not for sale.

  • No More Zombiemon?
    by RPGesus

    *So I got an e-mail today because a person reported my Zombie Squirtle as a copyright infringement…only Squirtle mind you, which struck…

    So I got an e-mail today because a person reported my Zombie Squirtle as a copyright infringement…only Squirtle mind you, which struck me as odd (maybe they want to sell one of their own and don’t want the competition). Anyway: I responded of course with the following legal information concerning fair use, copyright, IPR, and legal parody. I don’t blame anyone for noting a copyright concern, hell, I’ve done it myself 4 times now; but something a lot of people don’t know is what I included in my response as follows: Please see the following statements and links to material that support my legal right to post and sell this art. / My work generally is acceptable as “Fair Use” specifically under the article of parodies as defined by: A parody (pronounced /ˈpærədiː/; also called send-up or spoof), in contemporary usage, is a work created to mock, comment on, or poke fun at an original work, its subject, or author, or some other target, by means of humorous, satiric or ironic imitation. As the literary theorist Linda Hutcheon (2000: 7) puts it, “parody … is imitation with a critical difference, not always at the expense of the parodied text.” Another critic, Simon Dentith (2000: 9), defines parody as “any cultural practice which provides a relatively polemical allusive imitation of another cultural production or practice.” Often, the most satisfying element of a good parody is seeing others mistake it for the genuine article. Parody may be found in art or culture, including literature, music (although “parody” in music has a rather wider meaning than for other art forms), and cinema. Parodies are sometimes colloquially referred to as spoofs or lampoons. Fair Use: Fair use is a doctrine in United States copyright law that allows limited use of copyrighted material without requiring permission from the rights holders, such as use for scholarship or review. It provides for the legal, non-licensed citation or incorporation of copyrighted material in another author’s work under a four-factor balancing test. The term “fair use” originated in the United States, but has been added to Israeli law as well; a similar principle, fair dealing, exists in some other common law jurisdictions. Civil law jurisdictions have other limitations and exceptions to copyright. Fair Use in the United States The legal concept of “Test copyright” was first ratified by the Kingdom of Great Britain’s Statute of Anne of 1709. As room was not made for the authorized reproduction of copyrighted content within this newly formulated statutory right, the courts gradually created a doctrine of “fair abridgment,” which later became “fair use,” that recognized the utility of such actions. The doctrine only existed in the U.S. as common law until it was incorporated into the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. § 107, reprinted here: / “ Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 17 U.S.C. § 106 and 17 U.S.C. § 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include: 1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes; / 2. the nature of the copyrighted work; / 3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and / 4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work. The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.[1] / ” The four factors of analysis for fair use set forth above derive from the classic opinion of Joseph Story in Folsom v. Marsh, 9 F.Cas. 342 (1841), in which the defendant had copied 353 pages from the plaintiff’s 12-volume biography of George Washington in order to produce a separate two-volume work of his own. The court rejected the defendant’s fair use defense with the following explanation: / “ [A] reviewer may fairly cite largely from the original work, if his design be really and truly to use the passages for the purposes of fair and reasonable criticism. On the other hand, it is as clear, that if he thus cites the most important parts of the work, with a view, not to criticize, but to supersede the use of the original work, and substitute the review for it, such a use will be deemed in law a piracy… In short, we must often… look to the nature and objects of the selections made, the quantity and value of the materials used, and the degree in which the use may prejudice the sale, or diminish the profits, or supersede the objects, of the original work. / ” Once these factors were codified as guidelines in 17 U.S.C. § 107, they were not rendered exclusive. The section was intended by Congress to restate, but not replace, the prior judge-made law. Courts are still entitled to consider other factors as well. Fair use tempers copyright’s exclusive rights to serve the purpose of copyright law, which the U.S. Constitution defines as the promotion of “the Progress of Science and useful Arts” (Art. I, § 8, cl. 8). This principle applies particularly well to the case of criticism and also sheds light on various other limitations on copyright’s exclusive rights, particularly the scenes à faire doctrine. Effects on Work’s Value The fourth factor measures the effect that the allegedly infringing use has had on the copyright owner’s ability to exploit his original work. The court not only investigates whether the defendant’s specific use of the work has significantly harmed the copyright owner’s market, but also whether such uses in general, if widespread, would harm the potential market of the original. The burden of proof here rests on the defendant for commercial uses, but on the copyright owner for noncommercial uses. See Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios,[15] where the copyright owner, Universal, failed to provide any empirical evidence that the use of Betamax had either reduced their viewership or negatively impacted their business. In the aforementioned Nation case regarding President Ford’s memoirs, the Supreme Court labeled this factor “the single most important element of fair use” and it has indeed enjoyed some level of primacy in fair use analyses ever since. Yet the Supreme Court’s more recent announcement in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.[16] that “all [four factors] are to be explored, and the results weighed together, in light of the purposes of copyright” has helped modulate this emphasis in interpretation. In evaluating the fourth factor, courts often consider two kinds of harm to the potential market of the original work: First, courts consider whether the use in question acts as a direct market substitute for the original work. In the judgement of the Supreme Court in Acuff-Rose Music they decisively stated that, “when a commercial use amounts to mere duplication of the entirety of the original, it clearly supersedes the object of the original and serves as a market replacement for it, making it likely that cognizable market harm to the original will occur.” In one instance, a court ruled that this factor weighed against a defendant who had made unauthorized movie trailers for video retailers, since his trailers acted as direct substitutes for the copyright owner’s official trailers.[17] Second, courts also consider whether potential market harm might exist beyond that of direct substitution, such as in the potential existence of a licensing market. This consideration has weighed against commercial copy shops that make copies of articles in course-pack for college students, when a market already existed for the licensing of course-pack copies.[18] Courts recognize that certain kinds of market harm do not oppose fair use, such as when a parody or negative review impairs the market of the original work. Copyright considerations may not shield a work against adverse criticism. Fair Use and Parody Producers or creators of parodies of a copyrighted work have been sued for infringement by the targets of their ridicule, even though such use may be protected as fair use. These fair use cases distinguish between parodies (using a work in order to poke fun at or comment on the work itself) and satires (using a work to poke fun at or comment on something else). Courts have been more willing to grant fair use protections to parodies than to satires, but the ultimate outcome in either circumstance will turn on the application of the four fair use factors. In Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.[16] Supreme Court recognized parody as a fair use, even when done for profit. Roy Orbison’s publisher, Acuff-Rose Music Inc., had sued 2 Live Crew in 1989 for their use of Orbison’s “Oh, Pretty Woman” in a mocking rap version with altered lyrics. The Supreme Court viewed 2 Live Crew’s version as a ridiculing commentary on the earlier work, and ruled that when the parody was itself the product rather than used for mere advertising, commercial sale did not bar the defense. The Campbell court also distinguished parodies from satire, which they described as a broader social critique not intrinsically tied to ridicule of a specific work, and so not deserving of the same use exceptions as parody because the satirist’s ideas are capable of expression without the use of the other particular work. A number of appellate decisions have recognized parody as a protected fair use, including both the Second (Leibovitz v. Paramount Pictures Corp.) and Ninth Circuits (Mattel v. Walking Mountain Productions). Most recently, Suntrust v. Houghton Mifflin, a suit was brought unsuccessfully against the publication of The Wind Done Gone, which reused many of the characters and situations from Gone with the Wind, but told the events from the point of view of the slaves rather than the slaveholders. The Eleventh Circuit, applying Campbell, recognized that The Wind Done Gone was a protected parody, and vacated the district court’s injunction against its publication. International Influence The doctrine of fair use is no longer exclusive to the United States, with other jurisdictions having either implemented such a doctrine or considering its introduction. While influential in some quarters, other countries often have drastically different fair use criteria to the US, and in some countries there is little or no fair use defense available. Even within Europe, rules vary greatly between countries. Some countries have the concept of fair dealing instead of fair use. However many countries have some reference to an exemption for educational use, although the extent of this exemption may vary wildly. Examples of other commercial parodies of Pokemon creatures and personalities that are protected under the same legal rights: http://www.offworld.com/2009/06/bulba-sore-justin-whites-buste.html / http://sharkrobot.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1&products_id=240 / http://www.madman.com.au/actions/fanzone/gallery.do?method=viewGalleryItem&galleryItemId=15750&galleryId=67 / http://siliconsasquatch.files.wordpress.com/2009/05/pa-pokemon1.jpg / http://www.redbubble.com/people/stockdot/t-shirts/3205091-3-bulbasaur-beats-everything / http://www.redbubble.com/people/hawksey/t-shirts/2357258-2-pika-crushed / http://www.redbubble.com/people/arachnidgraphics/t-shirts/2026482-4-vaporeon / http://www.redbubble.com/people/rottenyouth/t-shirts/2194311-2-umbreon-and-espeon-yin-and-yang / http://www.redbubble.com/people/tsuyoshi/art/2408585-2-animemania / http://www.redbubble.com/people/malweran/t-shirts/2501269-3-pikachu-is-following-you / http://www.redbubble.com/people/sarahbraska/t-shirts/2485898-2-pikachu-star-blast / http://www.redbubble.com/people/atombat/t-shirts/2790163-1-pokemong / http://www.redbubble.com/people/missbaines/t-shirts/1648250-2-when-i-was-younger-evolution-just-meant-more-badass-pokemon / http://www.redbubble.com/people/byren/t-shirts/2147116-2-pika / http://www.redbubble.com/people/ryadasu/t-shirts/2954347-1-so-i-heard-you-like-mudkips-white-text This is of course before you include my own Zombiemon creations that are made in a fashion legally acceptable to the standards of what is considered a parody. So what are your thoughts and has this information educated you a bit about copyright law and the inclusion of fair use as parody? Also see the forum post ...incidentally, in case anyone is curious…RedBubble has allowed 21 Zombiemon shirts to be sold since I began posting them. Also, other examples of legal parody: / Robot Chicken / Simpsons / Family Guy / South Park / American Dad / Air Farce / Saturday Night Live / and if you can think of more, add them in a comment.

  • Clover-Because it is *trefoil (three-leaved), a symbol of the *Trinity. Patrick, St. Patrick (c.390-461), according to his Confessio or autobiography, was the son of Calpurnius, a Roman tax collector, at Banavem Tabernia, probably on the Welsh side of the River Severn. He was taken captive when a boy by raiders and carried off to Ireland where he was sold as a slave to Milchu, a chieftain of Antrim. After six years he escaped and went to Gaul. He studied for the priesthood at Auxerre and was then sent back to Ireland as a missionary because he spoke the Irish form of the Celtic tongue. He founded the see of LArmagh and spent the rest of his life spreading the Christian faith. He is thus the patron saint of Ireland. His feast day, 17 March, is kept as the Irish national holiday. The *shamrock is the Irish national emblem because St. Patrick converted the pagan King Loigaire by using clover, its three leaves separated, yet united in one stem, to demonstrate the mystery of the *Trinity. Research from Dictionary of Christian Lore and Legend / Oil on Canvas 24×30 from a photo of clover in the field while dew still on the grass, at home in the Smoky Mountains with my Nikon

  • The military ships

  • The military ships

RedBubble is a great place to find art, design, photos and writing from over 80,000 talented people.

You can buy their stuff

On stunning greeting cards, awesome t-shirts or beautiful prints to hang on your walls.

Risk Free Returns

It’s really simple. If you’re not happy with your purchase for any reason, we’ll fix it.

About RedBubble

Since February 2007 we’ve shipped over 331,500 items to more than 70 countries around the world.

Join In

Sign up for your free account, upload your work, join some groups and share your creative genius with the world.

Find More…

Doctrine T-Shirts

Doctrine Wall Art

Doctrine Journal Entries

Doctrine Writing

Doctrine Calendars