Lachlan Kent

Working with what you have - a bit of a rant

Something I’ve come to realise from my photography is that although a good tool (camera) can help the workman (photographer), the most important thing is that you get the most out of the camera you have.

I haven’t previously stated what sort of camera I use for my digital photos. This is partly because I think that people may judge my images differently if they new what I used. But I’ve decided to speak a bit more about what I use and how I use it.

Nearly all my digital images are shot on a point-and-shoot 6-megapixel Canon A540.

There are many advantages of shooting with a cheap, compact digital. For a start they’re cheap! Mine cost $300 with a 1GB SD card and case. The newer version of mine with an image stabiliser can be bought for pretty much the same price.
They can also produce quality images in classically good photography conditions (ie. soft, ambient light) as long as you use the lowest ISO and a tripod when a slower shutter speed is needed. You learn to work within different boundaries. For example, you quickly realise that to take acceptable photos of architecture you have to choose from limited viewpoints otherwise you’ll have curved lines that should be straight all over the place.
And they’re so small.
You can stick it in your pocket, and there you have it… the equivalent of a 35mm 35-135mm lens and it weighs next to nothing. You don’t need to think twice about slinging it round your shoulder, so you catch those moments where you wish you had your camera.

There are definately advantages for getting a “better” camera (such as an SLR). They are much more versatile in terms of the conditions in which you’re able to take good quality photos, and there’s something very satisfying about looking through the lense rather than off a live LCD. Personally, I have a 3 film SLRs and a rangefinder. The one I have begun to use predominantly is a Fujica ST705W with some really sharp fujinon and SMC Takumar lenses. I am pretty happy with what I have. I have the advantages of digital with my point and shoot, and advantages of film with my SLRs. One thing that I think that everyone should experience from using film is the need to make every photo count. With digital, you can tend towards shooting and then looking, whereas with film you must and do look, at everything, before you shoot. I think it has taught me to be thoughtful.

So what’s the point of all this? Well…. I’ve kind lost it a little bit, but basically it was to say that if you don’t have the money for a Hasselblad, fear not! The camera you have is probably better for learning on anyway as long as you expore its potential. And if you do try to use it to its fullest potential you’re likely to produce some fine work in the process.

  • Lys .

    Lys ., 5 months ago

    hey, its about time i saw some credit given to the point and shoot. its pretty much all i use for everything for all the same reasons. im flexible with what cameras i use so that i am able to capture some great stuff once in a while. props to the point and shoot!

  • Robert Boretti

    Robert Boretti, 5 months ago

    Well said.. Some of us don’t have the luxury of purchasing expensive equipment, but can still produce fine work with what we have.. Keep up the good work. Speaking of which.. I have some more commenting to do.. :-)

  • Daniel Rayfield

    Daniel RayfieldDiplomat, 5 months ago

    My camera is a $100 samsung digital still 6.1 you gotta work with what you can afford!! It does the job until I can get a dslr

  • Paul Louis Villani

    Paul Louis Vil..., 5 months ago

    A purposeful and honest rant and also one that I truly agree with.
    Never let “gear” stop your creative drive… let me give you an example… A talented guitarist pretty much sounds the same on a $3,000 Maton as on a $79 Kmart special! Your skills and talent will always shine through regardless of “tools”. These will eventually be gathered, it’s just part of the process.

  • Deri Dority

    Deri Dority, 5 months ago

    I fully agree with what you are saying. Very few people use their equipment to its fullest capacity, have never read the manual or use the program mode only on their DSLRs. If they aren’t using the extra features that they paid for, then it doesn’t matter if they have a 12 megapixal camera vs. someone who has less megapixels but use their camera to the very fullest effect.
    The only other advantage that a larger megapixal DSLR has is the stock agencies require a certain size photo. They don’t allow you to interpolate your image up. It pretty much requires an 8 megapixal on up camera.
    I see many professional photographers shooting with their point and shoots for certain situations. Many, do macro photography with a point and shoot. And of course the biggest advantage to the point and shoot is that you are more likely to have it around when those little unexpected things happen. I carry one in my purse at all times.

  • Daniel Rayfield

    Daniel RayfieldDiplomat, 5 months ago

    Its just a little emabarassing rocking up to a wedding or pro shoot and you pull out your little point and shoot with no focus window, however the weaker the tools the stronger you will become…

  • Mark German

    Mark German, 5 months ago

    Dare you to pick the 3 shots in my folio taken with a 3mp camera phone ;)

  • Kathryn Potempski

    Kathryn Potempski, 5 months ago

    Lachlan its not the size of the camera thats counts its the person thats using it,all my photos where taken with a second hand Sony point and shoot on ebay for $400.00.
    I am just about to purchase A KONIICA SLR second hand from a wonderful R/B member,
    I have always enjoyed you photos and style and always will no matter what camera you use.
    cheers
    Kathryn

  • Lachlan Kent

    Lachlan Kent in reply to Mark German’s comment, 5 months ago

    I don’t think I could confidentally guess, but is one Nearing Nirvana by any chance? (Because if it was, I would be truly excited.)

  • Mark German

    Mark German in reply to Lachlan Kent’s comment, 5 months ago

    Haha – wrong, mate. Don’t worry – I support what you say mate – it’s not the equipment, it’s the photographer. Working within your equipment’s boundaries is key.

  • Lachlan Kent

    Lachlan Kent in reply to Mark German’s comment, 5 months ago

    Oh well… that’s what happens when you go out on a limb… good work Mark. (Any chance to tell us which are that phone ones?)

  • Mark German

    Mark German in reply to Lachlan Kent’s comment, 5 months ago

    Absolutely not :)
    Would you buy a print from a camera phone?

  • Lachlan Kent

    Lachlan Kent in reply to Mark German’s comment, 5 months ago

    It probably wouldn’t affect my decision but I can see how it might affect some else’s.

Add your comment

You need to login or signup to add your comment to this work.