John, I tihnk it`s your color combinations that evoke so much emotion. This is a late summer afternoon trip that reminds me of so many amazing experiences in my only year at college in 71. Thanks for making that connection for me!
I love colour mate, it “talks” to my insides. 71! I was listening to Hendrix around then.
This must be one of those extremely rare Chorus Trees, and I think it’s warming up for a tune.
I read a paper on “art” that “beautiful” and “ugly” aren’t allowed in dialogue now as these terms are the most used by “commoners” void of “appreciation” of “art”. here: weird eh?
– John Scott
Gregoryno6over 3 years ago
Interesting article. Rather a torturous path from Edvard Munch to Andres Serrano, but worth a read.
in terms of “semantics” in the artworld and the inner circle of usage, yes. It merely reinforces the constructional ego mind of that collective thought and does nothing for movement “forward” in art, meaning with mental constructs it blinds us to “what we are actually seeing” rather than what we are “conditioned” to see via the group ethic
Comments
Another incarnation john! What happened to all the fascinating work that was here last night? You know I love this series – superb. :o)
I wanted to put it in another series (or folder) for private viewing only.
– John Scott
John, I tihnk it`s your color combinations that evoke so much emotion. This is a late summer afternoon trip that reminds me of so many amazing experiences in my only year at college in 71.
Thanks for making that connection for me!
I love colour mate, it “talks” to my insides. 71! I was listening to Hendrix around then.
– John Scott
Love this! :D
thanks Paul
– John Scott
stunning!
thanks! oi!
– John Scott
This must be one of those extremely rare Chorus Trees, and I think it’s warming up for a tune.
I read a paper on “art” that “beautiful” and “ugly” aren’t allowed in dialogue now as these terms are the most used by “commoners” void of “appreciation” of “art”. here:
weird eh?
– John Scott
Interesting article. Rather a torturous path from Edvard Munch to Andres Serrano, but worth a read.
in terms of “semantics” in the artworld and the inner circle of usage, yes. It merely reinforces the constructional ego mind of that collective thought and does nothing for movement “forward” in art, meaning with mental constructs it blinds us to “what we are actually seeing” rather than what we are “conditioned” to see via the group ethic
– John Scott
Very interesting painting John.
thank you Hollie.
– John Scott
It is very interesting, i love it so much…
I’ll find time to visit your site, as I love your work also Nurhilal, thanks
– John Scott
awesome, this really speaks on a deeper level than most art
thanks mouseman, funny how we just seem to “feel” a depth to imagery that doesn’t directly say “anything” on the surface.
– John Scott
Great work x
Anita, thank you
– John Scott