odd
this: little story is odd. Being a sceptic with anything NASA does for our benefit, there seems to always be an ulterior motive especially when millions need fresh water down here. If one wants to find water then go no further than your tap or the local beach and build a desalination plant. My hunch is this, I read years ago that the moon was hollow and “could contain an extra terrestrial base deep within its core”. The reasons for the underground base are as wild as any speculation one could imagine. Quick access to earth would seem feasible. Another tit bit about the moon has caused speculation for years, why is it the exact size of our Sun when eclipsing, is this coincidence? It seems the position it is placed in orbit around the earth is just too amazing to speculate. The sheer amount of craters dotting the moon is staggering and indicates it has been hit for millennia, how come it hasn’t disintegrated under the onslaught of asteroids and comets. It’s orbit is strange also as it has a stagnant orbit, meaning we always see the same “face” as it faces the earth. Why doesn’t it rotate like all bodies in space? I’m not sure on that one.
One theory I have as to why NASA may need to “bomb” the moon is this. Sonar testing… when one bombs a body then listens to the echo one can guage a pretty good density reading of the body that has been hit. Are they looking for the hidden et base, or water? My hunch is this, if there is water, then Hydrogen cells can be used for power, which would fuel “any base” that exists now whether terrestrial or humanoid. Why not just send a drilling rig up there to find water? why bombs? more questions than answers.
Kain White 20 days ago
Yeah bombing the Moon sounds like a bad idea.
It also seems strange that they found buckets on the moon let alone the water in them! ;)
JohnScottArtist replied 20 days ago
very odd methinks
RVRFNX 13 days ago
I like the way you think. The truth is stranger than fiction.
JohnScottArtist replied 13 days ago
Yeh I tend to press my own buttons on these issues, mainly as we need more money on “humanitarian” issues than science. We have enough science to change the world 100 times over, and yet we are still suffering under ancient power rules that seem akin to Gorillas and monkeys.