Nowadays, a lot of people have taken photos only with digital cameras, but I’ve seen more than a few express an interest in film, wondering what the fuss is all about and why people still use it. Which then raises the question, “should I try film?”
I have to say, the answer is, “YES!”
But Uncle Stevie, the man in the camera shop told me film is dead.
Of course he did! They make more money selling a $2,000 digital camera than selling a roll of film. A lot of consumer level films have been killed off, but for the most part the pro ranges are intact, and these are the films you want to be playing with. In fact, they’re far from gone. Fuji has continued to develop its portrait films, has introduced a brand new slide film, and has reintroduced the discontinued Velvia 50 due to high demand.
But Uncle Stevie, film is too expensive!
It really depends on what you’re doing. Shooting a two day event on film is expensive, hell yeah. That’s the sort of thing where digital comes into its own. But going out on the town, taking some artistic shots, it’s not so bad.
36 frames is plenty. No, you can’t check the viewfinder and retake the shot 100 times until you get it. But what you can do is think about what you’re doing. Really look at the surrounds, see what’s in the viewfinder, think about your aperture and shutter speed, and just nail the shot the first time.
You can buy a brand new Nikon FM10 with lens for $200US. Plenty of fully automatic cameras are for sale second hand for next to nothing. Even with buying the film and getting it processed, even getting a high res scan done, it’s a lot of rolls before you match the cost of a digital, which you’ll probably replace after 18 months in any case.
I’m worried I’ll get the exposure wrong, and I won’t know without an LCD!
You know how your digital camera has that awesome built in meter that gets the exposure just right every time?
Guess what. They were around before digital cameras. Film cameras have built in meters as well, there’s very little that will go wrong. dSLR cameras are designed after film SLR cameras, you just have a lot less buttons to worry about with your film camera!
What film should I use?
You have three options. Slide/transparency film, colour negative and black and white negative.
The colour negative is the typical film most people use/used which you take into the shop and get your photos in an hour. They all use the same chemical processing (C-41), these can be processed and printed in virtually any minilab. While you can get consumer films in this, I’d suggest going for something a little more. My personal favourite are the Fuji portrait films. There’s a huge range available and each with its own characteristics.
Slide, or transparencies are just that. Often mounted and projected straight from the processed film, this is the product of choice for landscape photographers. Very fine grained, these tend to cost a bit more both to buy and process, but the results are well worth it. Films such as Velvia are highly saturated, making colours just pop out of the image, which is why it’s most often used for landscapes. You can have prints done from slides as well. This is the Ilfochrome/cibachrome process, with often stunning results. Like the film, it’s more expensive, but well worth it.
Black and white is probably the easiest option for doing it all yourself. Films, developers, papers and whole darkroom set ups are readily available so you can be a part of the process from start to finish. This is where the magic of photography comes from, seeing an image appear in the dim light of the darkroom. It’s something special.
This is where the most fun is to be had as well. Unlike the other two film types, there’s not one single process to use. There’s a multitude of film developers, each giving a different result with different films. Variable development times also give different results. This continues with a range of different papers, each with different qualities to fine tune your final image.
It sounds difficult, but you just need to start with one film, one developer and master that before trying other products and getting a look which suits. You can experiment and develop your own look, or learn what each result gives and apply the best one to the particular image.
If this doesn’t sound like your cup of tea, there’s always photo labs which will do it for you!
While the answer to should you try film is ‘yes’, there’s no definitive answer to any other question with film. It’s a matter of using the product which best suits what you want to get out of your image making.
If at all possible, DO find a good pro lab. In my experience the staff are often very friendly and helpful, and provide a much better service than a minilab.
The APUG forum is a great place to find information about film and processing, and it has regional forums too, so you can find people in your local area.
Fuji’s film range and information can be found here Kodak here and Ilford’s website is a great resource not only for black and white photo products, but it also has a forum and other helpful information.
So why not give film a go. Who knows, you might fall in love with the magic of film.
Craig Goldsmith, 6 months ago
Thanks for posting Steve!
Steven Lippis, 6 months ago
No problem!
I figure everyone should hear my not so humble opinions. :D
LittleHelen, 6 months ago
But I don’t want too :|
DarrellMoseley, 6 months ago
Steven, I have shot lots on 8mm, and have thought of adding some to have people check out! Some I had music, like snakeskin cowboy playing when I recorded to vhs, and was of my son giving his Dad a ride around the MotoCross tract on a four wheeler, after the races were over! It was only for fun! Others are of the area, and how it use to be, before all the growth come! I was wondering on any ideals of adding videos! You tube, would the music be a problem! I have shot short videos, on my digital camera, that are in AVI files on my computer! I really want to add some to my project as well! Your input, would be very helpful to Uncle D! Nephews at batting cages! Misc! I am very interested in shooting short videos, and putting them all together! PLEASE HELP! Your friend, Darrell
Steven Lippis, 6 months ago
Sure you do!
Deborah Bowness, 6 months ago
It’s something I’ve been thinking about for a while, and the above makes very interesting reading….Thanks Steve!
Paul Gana, 6 months ago
I have always loved the higher detail and better colors inherent in film
Paul Gana, 6 months ago
but yeah I have used 35 mm from the very beginning and will continue using it, BUT I have begun using the large format 4×5
Christopher E..., 6 months ago
awesome info steven.and a gent for passing it on!
Steven Lippis, 6 months ago
I’d love to move onto 4×5 paul, actually, 6×6 is what really grabs me, haven’t taken the plunge yet though. No doubt i’ll regret waiting so long to do so!
Watertoy, 6 months ago
Hhhhmmm…I can’t see myself going back to film now. I can’t decide whether to buy a Pentax SLR so that I can use my Ricoh Lens from an old Film SLR Camera or whether to go with just upgrading my Pentax Digital to a thinner model – A40 or M40. Any thoughts anyone ?
TonyLegg, 6 months ago
Film is stunning,
the very vibrancy and saturation of transparencies, to the amazing latitude of Ilfords XP2. This film will capture the shadows while still giving detail in the extreme highlights. Stick i in a lab for c41 processing go and have a coffee and its ready….
The are some things that digital excels at. But film still has it. for landscape, etc.. certainly for me…..
example of 60’s compact camera using xp2 illustrating the enormous dynamic range of this film … and the quality of old prime optics…
http://www.redbubble.com/people/tonylegg/art/325730-5-dynamics-of-film
95% of my images are shot on film, an shot on amazingly cheap equipment.
Daniel Bowen, 6 months ago
Great article since reading this i have been given a second hand Ricoh R10M with a Hanimex 80-200mm lens as well as a ricoh 35-70mm lens and a variaty of macro and polarizer filters. I find using film is more fun than shooting with a digital