Control. VII

Control.  VII by DragonFlyer
Control.  VII by DragonFlyer
  • Mel Brackstone

    Mel Brackstone

    Love the way you’ve used the light here…

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thanks very much Mel. For me this is something like – emphasising what needs to be seen ‘least’ can put a lot more emphasis on what ‘should’ be the focal point, but isn’t…. (if that makes any sense at all lol)
    K xx

  • msdebbie

    msdebbie

    I love that I am wondering what colour her nails are painted!
    And agree with Mel – lighting is superb xoxo

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Teehee…. that never occurred to me! What a funny thing lol – and thanks for your lovely words re the lighting…
    K xx

  • ROUBLE RUST

    ROUBLE RUST

    Gorgeous work xx Absolutely wonderful.

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thanks so much Rouble! I think this one is kind of ‘more attractive’ maybe in itself than some of the others…
    K xx

  • frogster

    frogster

    Nice work on this DF

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thanks very much frogster – that’s a big compliment coming from such a software master as yourself – me happy :)))
    K xx

  • Druidstorm

    Druidstorm

    Hidden is your beauty to the shadow of dreams! Beautiful capture and effect friend!!!...)o(

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thank you my friend – thank you :)))
    K xx

  • R Nixon

    R Nixon

    Fragments of a dream? I want to be desired but am just a normal person. But, that isn’t enough for me, Because I’m not that inside? No matter what you see, if you’d take the time to look you’d see. But you wont.

    I wont say it’s what you’re trying to say, just what I get from what you’ve produced. Essentially, pain. Pain at petty superficial shit.

    I wouldn’t be adverse to an extended conversation on this.

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Good – I wouldn’t mind either. For me – this image is too ‘pretty’ for what it’s supposed to be… which is a pretty silly thing to say because I always hope to leave plenty of ‘space’ for the viewer to ‘see’ what they can themselves…
    I think here I’d recently ‘found’ a cute bokeh image that had worked well somewhere else, and I wanted it to ‘work’ again. But – that’s not how these things happen. This is 1 shot out of about 400 – about 60 are partially edited (the rest definitely weren’t worth it) and about 12-15 are ‘further’ processed so far…
    I find I still get caught in this silly stuff on this site where when I hit a run of my work getting popular + (even though I often prefer it to NOT be popular…), then when the ‘run’ ends and I hit a period of not getting noticed so much I start thinking again “what will THEY like?”
    I KNOW this is wrong – and it never works anyway – but… just my own insecurities and lack of confidence showing…
    K x

  • R Nixon

    R Nixon

    O.K., I’ll give you this . . . depending on what you’re trying to do, this could be considered as commercial or being a little too slick as independent art. Just depends on what you’re after. I will take the time to look at the link.

    As to photography and “400 shots”; you aren’t offered the convenience of traditional art. A painter chooses what to include in their work, a photographer only can choose what to exclude (Yeah, I know, that’s generalist bullshit, but still true in a generalistic sense.) to get across their point.

    You build confidence through succeeding. (Yeah, sure, other ways too.)

    You’re evil and keep trying to keep me up all night.

    It’s bedtime for me now.

    Richard

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Hahahaha… O dear – turns out you’re like so many other men who blame a woman for their own behaviour lol…

    But – on all the other things – you’re right on. I agree with your generalisation re photography vs painting – I can’t paint for nuts – people have asked me to, as they say what I’ve done comes out ok… but the process drives me crazy. I do one layer, another, step back, look at what’s there and inevitably my reaction is ‘O NO… you mean it’s not finished yet??? I have to ADD MORE??? It frustrates me to death…
    Yet, I’ve now found I can sit at a computer screen processing an image very happily for hours and days and even weeks (on and off) – and I have no problem with frustration…
    The difficult part is knowing where to stop.
    I’ve been told I could do book covers – I guess that’s where this image would maybe work – but that is NOT what I want to do (unless I need to to earn a living), so, I agree that this is ‘too slick’.
    i made a few other comments in the 2nd bmail I sent you…

    And – I DO intend to improve my confidence ;)))

    Have a good night
    K xx

  • R Nixon

    R Nixon

    There’s nothing wrong with being commercial; just like in fine art, there’s good and bad. I’m guilty of true banality for money. For whatever it’s worth, people looking to sell a house or car, or get a shot of their kid playing soccer, generally aren’t looking beyond a straight representation. I probably could direct you to our commercial Website, but I’ll lose respect, I’m sure: MuseWurks.com

    Look under commercial. I just like being behind a lens enough that I’ll do it for money and love.

  • DragonFlyer replied

    thanks – I think I would too… as long as I don’t get too stuck with having to put so much time and effort into the ‘for money’ that I have no energy left for the ‘for love’...

  • R Nixon

    R Nixon

    As to painting, I have one of my old ones on here: Fox River c. 1904. It was actually done as a magazine cover about a dozen years ago. Even given that it was commercial, it’s fairly consistent with what I did stylistically up until I let the paint dry in my brushes.

  • R Nixon

    R Nixon

    And a quote from an old painting instructor of mine: “The time to stop is when the chances of ruining it outweigh the chances of improving it.” Don Kerr.

    Painters used to “turn their work to the wall” to give them time to see it clearly. You can get so involved in details, you miss the whole point of the work. I’m guilty as anyone of this.

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Yes – I think the ‘turning the work to the wall’ concept is just as relevant to foto processing as painting…
    No one is perfect…

  • Danica Radman - Tazzina

    Danica Radman ...

    you are light master!
    music like work, you schubert person
    brava!!!!

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Now that is a wonderful compliment my friend – Schubert was truly a master :)))
    K xx

  • Jessica Walker

    Jessica Walker

    Your work has been featured in Self As Other :)

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thank you very much for this! I am really pleased Jessica – thank you again!
    K xx

  • Clare Colins

    Clare Colins

    Another on I missed…what’s going on?
    Great work K…lovely tones and textures. clare :) x

  • DragonFlyer replied

    Thanks hun – I think sometimes things go wonky in our feeds – I know there are images of your I miss too :(
    Did you notice the ‘exchange’ above with one R Nixon? He now bmails me regularly to have ‘discussions about ‘art’ in general and his or my work in specifics… you might note he does not refrain from putting quite bluntly what he really thinks…
    K xxx

Add your comment

You need to login or signup to add your comment to this work.