UN slams Australia's Aboriginal policies
By Julian Drape, AAP, 27 August, 2009, 8:24 pm
A UN expert on indigenous rights says the ongoing intervention into remote Aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory is overtly discriminatory and Australia must tackle its “entrenched” racism.
The critical comments by the UN’s special rapporteur on indigenous rights, James Anaya, came just hours after a proposed new indigenous representative body was unveiled by Australia’s Aboriginal social justice commissioner Tom Calma.
Mr Calma told the National Press Club indigenous people had suffered from the absence of a strong national body since the abolition of ATSIC in 2005.
“We have lacked the most fundamental of requirements for a reconciled nation – a robust genuine partnership between government and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples,” he said.
But Professor Anaya believes that’s not all that’s been holding back indigenous Australia.
He says NT intervention measures, including compulsory income management and blanket bans on alcohol and pornography, are “overtly discriminatory” and further stigmatise already stigmatised communities.
They’re incompatible with various international conventions, covenants, treaties and declarations, he said.
“Some kind of special measures could be justified but they need to be narrowly tailored to the specific circumstances that exist,” the rapporteur told reporters in Canberra.
“(But currently) people who have a demonstrated capacity to manage their income are included. “It’s inappropriate to their circumstances but is also, as expressed by them, demeaning.”
Prof Anaya was also scathing of Labor’s insistence that housing funds would only flow if indigenous communities leased their land to the government for 40 years. [this is about Govt and Mining companies not needing to negotiate with Aboriginal people — mining and money]
“It’s a mistake to assume that indigenous peoples … aren’t capable of taking care of their homes,” he said.
Prof Anaya said the Rudd government should “swiftly” reinstate the Racial Discrimination Act, which was suspended by the Howard government so the intervention’s more extreme measures could be rolled out.
Indigenous Affairs Minister Jenny Macklin has promised to introduce legislation to reinstate the act in the spring session of parliament, but wants to continue many of the compulsory measures.
A new national representative body could be up and running by October next year if Mr Calma gets his way. [this so-called Rep body is top-heavy and loaded with Westernised and assimilated Aboriginal (selected) safe people, favourable to modern culture, ignorant of their spiritual/cultural ancestry]
_ It won’t deliver services or wield real power, but rather provide “credible and robust” advice on policies such as the intervention. _[yeh, right, as in right-wing that is]
The body will be independent from government and operate as a registered company, comprising an eight-member national executive, a 128 seat national congress and an ethics council to ensure its members are all “fit and proper persons”. by who’s definition of “fit and proper”?]
There’ll be an equal number of men and women members, and two full-time co-chairs, one male and one female.
Mr Calma’s model, which draws on 12 months of extensive consultations with indigenous people, would be set up using $5 million of commonwealth funds.
But after 10 years it would be “self sufficient, self determining and truly independent of government”.
The social justice commissioner envisages government, corporate and charity dollars would contribute to a $200 million investment fund “to ensure a sufficient recurrent expenditure base for the organisation”.
But that vision’s already somewhat cloudy.
“The government has no plans to contribute to such a fund at this time,” Ms Macklin said in a statement after Mr Calma released his model.
“The government is prepared to provide modest and appropriate recurrent funding for the national representative body once it is established, as well as providing support in its critical establishment phase.”
Mr Calma believes the new representative body will help Australia own its history – both good and bad – within 20 years.
Prof Anaya also sees reasons for hope.
“I have been impressed by the strength, resilience and vision of indigenous communities determined to move towards a better future despite having endured tremendous suffering at the hands of historical forces and entrenched racism,” he said at the end of his 11-day visit.
JRGarland
I fear it’s too little too late policies. What will happen until the solution is made? Will they halt the destruction or go on with it? If they go on with it it may be too late when the decission is made. Even then it may not preserve the heritage. Well written.
Crowmanic replied
I appreciate your sentiment and thoughts JR, even though this matter is not in your direct nor immediate area and life circle, as such.
Gregory John O...
I watch the Social Justice Commissioners Press Club speech. Wonderful man !!
It took the Rudd Government 18 months after comming to office to sign up to respect the UN Convention on the Right of the Indigenous Peoples. Rudd supported the Intervention, and the dismantalling of the Racial discrimination laws. Community assets and mineral rights have been confiscated. 8 million dollars allocated to build housing last year, one year later not one house built …..... and they say the crime rae has increased since the intervention was introduced..
Crowmanic replied
Unfortunately Aboriginal Affairs is an industry in its own right… as long as the Aborigines are seen as a “problem” it is inevitable that status quo and vested interests and greedy people will keep it so.
Leise K
I know a beautiful lady from Gapuwiyak in East Arnhem Land. She is a fibre artist.
She told me some horrific things about the intervention.
As an Elder of our “proud” land – she feels so belittled by the financial control and having to gain permissions to move about – like visiting friends in other states.
I was dumb founded.
My mother is an Elder living in an urban community. She like the other Elders in her community have complete financial management over their money & the freedom to come and go as they please.
Why is such a line drawn between the same peoples because of where and how they choose (or were born) to live – remote traditional ways or the “civilised” urbanised way?
Bravo to the UN. When will Australians band together like they did in 1967 – to bring about changes and bring bare essential human rights into play for all Indigenous people?
Crowmanic replied
Actually/factually Australians did not “band together” in ‘67 … they really only the thought they were Voting to give Aborigines the “right to vote” at elections, not fully aware of the “knock-on” effect that was the key to recognition of Aboriginals being full citizens (or is that “fooled-citizens” like the majority of our population?)
Thanks for the sharing and t5he interest as always.
DragonFlyer
At least someone, somewhere is speaking out… The extent and amount of abuse the indigenous Australians have been subjected to is extraordinary. Even more extraordinary is the fact that there are still some who have not totally succumbed and still manage to struggle on in this never-ending fight to obtain some justice and equity as citizens of their own country… My respect for those who continue to be able to maintain their attempts at ‘rational’ dialogue with the Australian govt grows constantly…
K xx
Crowmanic replied
Unfortunately, I am not one of the “rational” blakfellas… I have been in this work and community affairs far too long to have rationale and rhetoric taken as truth … if anything I am still very much in the “emotional” sensitive group… the minority, who continue to say/see it as we feel it.
Thx for the interest/comment.