3D SCOPE
A Home For The Humble Anaglyph
It's blue and red, but is it 3D?
|
|
Hi guys, I’ve been looking at the pictures in the Anaglyph group and I’m a bit concerned. A fundamental principle of stereophotography and 3D anaglyphs, is that it is a composite image made from two original images, which are taken at a slightly different angle. These are then combined through the red and blue filters to create the illusion of dimensionality. This can be done digitally using either two cameras that fire off simultaneously (a stereo camera rig) or with one camera using what is known as the “cha-cha” method (taking one shot and then shifting the camera and taking a second one). You cannot make a 3D picture using a single photo and just displacing the blue and red layers. If the red and blue at the foreground of the picture is displaced by the same amount as in the background, then there is nothing to trick the eyes into creating a 3D effect. The displacement of the red and blue channels is normally bigger the furthest your subject is from the camera, and they meet towards the front of the picture (what is known as the stereo window). What is also critical that the red and blue images are only displaced horizontally but stay vertically on the same plane. You can see this effect on the two pictures I’ve uploaded to the group: the Hyacynth picture is taken with a single camera using the cha-cha method, whereas the B&W Syntagma one was taken with an original stereoscopic camera that took two simultaneous images on a glass plate. Having said this, there are techniques and tools available for converting 2D to 3D pictures, but that involves using pixel-shifting algorithms and a LOT of hard work, to simulate the two different images that can then be combined to create the 3D anaglyph. But I don’t think these have been used here. I would be interested to find out what techniques have been used to create the other pictured posted to the group. Regards |
|
|
Although all the anaglyphs in “Anaglyph world” may not have been produced using the technique standard, I still think they do produce a clearly visible 3D effect, saying that there is always room for improvement. I personally use two program called “StereoPhoto Maker” and “Callipygian 3D”. Please note that the group is intended for the use of amateur and professional alike and for the development and interest in the medium in general, I am sure as the group develops, so will the techniques used. |
|
|
The method I use is as follows: |